Mastering speaking skill needs a lot of practices, and to speak English
well and fluently needs a long process. Hence, the appropriate method of the
teaching and learning is very important to help students master the speaking
ability. Therefore, buzz group is determined to be a method of teaching
speaking in this research. Buzz group is an activity
which arouse the students to talk confidently in the class. This activity
invites the students to convey their ideas freely in a small group before every
student speaks in front of the teacher to express their thought. In this
method, the students are divided into six groups which every group consists of
approximately five people each. From this activity, it is expected that the
students will get a lot of informations so that they are not anxious when they
convey the information about certain topic given by the teacher.
The formulation
of the research problems were: 1) How is the students’
speaking
ability when they are taught without using buzz group?
2) How is the students’ speaking ability when they are
taught by using buzz group? 3) Are there any significant different scores on speaking
ability between the students who are taught by using buzz group and those who
are taught without using buzz group?
The objectives
of this research were to: 1) describe the
students’ speaking
ability when they are taught without using buzz group, 2) define the students’ speaking ability when they are taught by
using buzz group, 3) find out the significant
different scores on
speaking ability between the students who are taught by using buzz group and
those who are taught without using buzz group.
Research Method:
1) the research design in this study was quasi experimental design with
quantitative approach with non randomized, pretest-posttest, 2) the population
of this study was all students of class X at MAN Kunir Blitar, 3) the samples
were class XA consisting of thirty two students who are as the
experimental group, and class XB consisting of thirty six students
who are as the control group, 4) the research instrument was test, 5) the data
analysis was using t-test.
The result
pointed out that the students’ mean score of the experimental group in
pretestwas 56.6, and the students’ mean score of
control group in pretest was 54.9. Meanwhile, the students’ mean score of the
experimental group in posttest was 68.6, and the students’ mean score of the
control group in posttest was 62.6. The result of
the statistical computation using t-test revealed that the obtained t0was
4.72. Then the t-values of t0.05were about 1.67, and the t- values of t0.01 was about 2.39. Therefore, the calculated value
(4.72) was much larger than the t-values (t0.05= 1.67 and t0.01 = 2.39), so there was significant difference in the
scores between the students who were taught using buzz group, and those who
were not taught using buzz group. It means that Ha states that the students of
the class X at MAN Kunir Blitar who are taught by using buzz group get better
speaking ability than those who are not taught by using buzz group is accepted.
While, Ho which states that the students of the class X at MAN Kunir
Blitar who are taught using buzz group do not get better speaking ability than
those who are not taught using buzz group is rejected. In other words, buzz
group can be used as an alternative to teach speaking and to improve students’
speaking ability to the students at the senior high school level.
Untuk mendapatkan FILE LENGKAP dalam bentuk MS-Word Mulai BAB 1 s.d. DAFTAR PUSTAKA, (bukan pdf) silahkan klik Cara Mendapatkan File atau klik disini
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar